Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator of aerosol composition
2010508 citationsPhilip B. Russell, R. W. Bergstrom et al.Atmospheric chemistry and physicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. W. Strawa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. W. Strawa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. W. Strawa more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. W. Strawa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. W. Strawa. The network helps show where A. W. Strawa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. W. Strawa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. W. Strawa.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. W. Strawa based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. W. Strawa. A. W. Strawa is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Strawa, A. W., et al.. (2013). Improving Retrievals of Regional PM2.5 Concentrations From MODIS and OMI Multi-Satellite Observations. AGUFM. 2013.2 indexed citations
Russell, Philip B., R. W. Bergstrom, Y. Shinozuka, et al.. (2010). Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator of aerosol composition. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 10(3). 1155–1169.508 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Agrawal, P.K., et al.. (2009). Comparison of Deep Blue and Land Surface Reflectance in the San Joaquin Valley. AGUFM. 2009.1 indexed citations
8.
Oza, Sandip R., et al.. (2008). INVESTIGATING CORRELATIONS BETWEEN SATELLITE-DERIVED AEROSOL OPTICAL DEPTH AND GROUND PM2.5 MEASUREMENTS IN CALIFORNIA'S SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY WITH MODIS DEEP BLUE. AGUFM. 2008.5 indexed citations
9.
Newcomer, Michelle, et al.. (2007). UNDERSTANDING THE CORRELATION OF SAN JOAQUIN AIR QUALITY MONITORING WITH AEROSOL OPTICAL THICKNESS SATELLITE MEASUREMENTS. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007.6 indexed citations
10.
Strawa, A. W., et al.. (2007). Aero3X: Fast, Accurate Measurement of Aerosol Optical Properties for Climate and Air Quality Studies. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007.2 indexed citations
Kirchstetter, Thomas W., A. W. Strawa, Robert A. Harley, et al.. (2004). Characterization of Particle and Gas Phase Pollutant Emissions from Heavy- and Light-Duty Vehicles in a California Roadway Tunnel. AGUFM. 2004.6 indexed citations
Strawa, A. W., et al.. (1990). Development of non-intrusive instrumentation for NASA-Ames Ballistic Range and Shock Tunnel. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.