A. Scalia

1.3k total citations
97 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

A. Scalia is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Scalia has authored 97 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Mechanics of Materials, 30 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 29 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in A. Scalia's work include Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena (37 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (25 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (18 papers). A. Scalia is often cited by papers focused on Thermoelastic and Magnetoelastic Phenomena (37 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (25 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (18 papers). A. Scalia collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Romania and Georgia. A. Scalia's co-authors include Michele Ciarletta, M.A. Sumbatyan, Merab Svanadze, D. Ieşan, Rita Tracinà, S. Sambataro, R. Giordano, Stan Chiriţă, Fábio Porto and F. Porto and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Solids and Structures and Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

In The Last Decade

A. Scalia

94 papers receiving 980 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. Scalia Italy 17 623 221 181 169 132 97 1.1k
F. J. Margetan United States 15 481 0.8× 43 0.2× 158 0.9× 92 0.5× 94 0.7× 59 758
Jean C. Ragusa United States 17 91 0.1× 147 0.7× 25 0.1× 41 0.2× 14 0.1× 95 887
S. Pennisi Italy 14 83 0.1× 68 0.3× 152 0.8× 51 0.3× 21 0.2× 76 717
L.R.T. Gardner United Kingdom 19 319 0.5× 73 0.3× 64 0.4× 49 0.3× 48 0.4× 39 1.1k
А. В. Порубов Russia 19 368 0.6× 196 0.9× 197 1.1× 11 0.1× 54 0.4× 84 1.2k
G. Lehner Germany 12 79 0.1× 27 0.1× 128 0.7× 123 0.7× 8 0.1× 55 492
Justin Brown United States 16 220 0.4× 431 2.0× 73 0.4× 181 1.1× 28 0.2× 56 712
I. I. Kolodner United States 8 118 0.2× 298 1.3× 15 0.1× 8 0.0× 17 0.1× 22 689
Leonid Prigozhin Israel 16 62 0.1× 41 0.2× 67 0.4× 26 0.2× 51 0.4× 40 953
A. P. Kiselev Russia 15 174 0.3× 31 0.1× 398 2.2× 34 0.2× 39 0.3× 96 724

Countries citing papers authored by A. Scalia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Scalia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Scalia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Scalia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Scalia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Scalia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Scalia. The network helps show where A. Scalia may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Scalia

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Scalia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Scalia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Scalia. A. Scalia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Scalia, A., et al.. (2013). Mathematical problems in the coupled linear theory of bone poroelasticity. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 66(9). 1554–1566. 25 indexed citations
2.
Scalia, A., et al.. (2012). A fast BIE iteration method for an arbitrary body in a flow of incompressible inviscid fluid. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 237(1). 508–519.
3.
Scalia, A., et al.. (2012). Mathematical Problems in the Theory of Bone Poroelasticity. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(2). 10 indexed citations
4.
Pappalardo, Francesco, Ping Zhang, Mark Halling‐Brown, et al.. (2008). Computational Simulations of the Immune System for Personalized Medicine: State of the Art and Challenges. Current pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine (Online). 6(4). 260–271. 14 indexed citations
5.
Ieşan, D. & A. Scalia. (2007). On the Deformation of Functionally Graded Porous Elastic Cylinders. Journal of Elasticity. 87(2-3). 147–159. 13 indexed citations
6.
Scalia, A., et al.. (2002). ON THE ASYMPTOTIC SPATIAL BEHAVIOR IN LINEAR THERMOELASTICITY OF MATERIALS WITH VOIDS. Journal of Thermal Stresses. 25(2). 183–193. 41 indexed citations
7.
Scalia, A. & M.A. Sumbatyan. (2000). . Journal of Elasticity. 60(2). 91–102. 19 indexed citations
8.
Scalia, A.. (1994). Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Shadow model for sub-barrier fusion applied to light systems’ ’’. Physical Review C. 49(5). 2847–2848. 2 indexed citations
9.
Scalia, A., et al.. (1994). On the steady vibrations of the thermoelastic porous materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 31(20). 2819–2834. 9 indexed citations
10.
Scalia, A.. (1992). A Grade Consistent Micropolar theory of Thermoelastic Materials with Voids. ZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik. 72(2). 133–140. 15 indexed citations
11.
Ciarletta, Michele & A. Scalia. (1991). Results and applications in thermoelasticity of materials with voids. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
12.
Scalia, A.. (1990). On some theorems in the theory of micropolar thermoelasticity. International Journal of Engineering Science. 28(3). 181–189. 13 indexed citations
13.
Scalia, A.. (1990). The extended elastic model applied to the reaction3He (α, γ)7Be. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 103(2). 213–220. 3 indexed citations
14.
Scalia, A.. (1989). A new approach to heavy-ion fusion.—I. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 101(5). 781–788. 3 indexed citations
15.
Scalia, A.. (1987). Subbarrier fusion with the elastic model. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 98(5). 571–588. 21 indexed citations
16.
Scalia, A.. (1985). The “elastic” model for heavy-ion reactions. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 88(4). 443–446. 3 indexed citations
17.
Scalia, A.. (1984). Entrance channel effects in heavy-ion reactions. Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento. 39(16). 383–389. 2 indexed citations
18.
Scalia, A.. (1984). Determination of the nucleus-nucleus potential from the generalized critical-distance model. Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento. 40(17). 523–526. 5 indexed citations
19.
Scalia, A.. (1983). Heavy-ion elastic scattering and its connections with fusion and absorption processes. Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento. 37(4). 129–134. 1 indexed citations
20.
Giordano, R., F. Porto, S. Sambataro, & A. Scalia. (1981). A modified SOD method applied to heavy-ion reactions. Lettere al nuovo cimento della societa italiana di fisica/Lettere al nuovo cimento. 31(5). 189–192. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026