Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Complications of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ercp: A Prospective Multicenter Study
2001667 citationsE. Masci, G Toti et al.The American Journal of Gastroenterologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Prada's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Prada with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Prada more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Prada. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Prada. The network helps show where A. Prada may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Prada
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Prada.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Prada based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. Prada. A. Prada is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Masci, E., G Toti, A. Mariani, et al.. (2001). Complications of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ercp: A Prospective Multicenter Study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 96(2). 417–423.667 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Declich, Paolo, et al.. (2000). Fundic gland polyps: a still elusive entity on the eve of the year 2000.. PubMed. 51(1). 3–8.16 indexed citations
9.
Borzio, Mauro, Franco Borzio, M Biraghi, et al.. (1999). [Topical beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in intestinal inflammatory diseases: the results of a multicentre trial].. PubMed. 45(1). 59–73.2 indexed citations
Passaretti, Sandro, U Comin, R Donzelli, et al.. (1992). Action of glucomannans on complaints in patients affected with chronic constipation: a multicentric clinical evaluation.. PubMed. 23(7). 421–5.12 indexed citations
14.
Beretta, Luigi, A. Bortoli, Marco Dinelli, et al.. (1991). Nizatidine (450 MG/DAY) versus ranitidine (450 MG/DAY) in the treatment of erosive esophagitis : a multicenter clinical trial. Current Therapeutic Research. 49(6). 968–985.2 indexed citations
15.
Pace, Fábio, E. Colombo, Assiamira Ferrara, et al.. (1988). Nizatidine and ranitidine in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer: a cooperative double-blind study of once-daily bedtime administration.. PubMed. 83(6). 643–5.12 indexed citations
G, Bianchi Porro, A. Prada, F. Parente, O. Sangaletti, & Maria Grazia Lazzaroni. (1982). The effect of pirenzepine on meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion, gastrin release and gastric emptying.. PubMed. 72. 159–62.7 indexed citations
20.
G, Bianchi Porro, A. Prada, Marco Petrillo, & Micaela Grossi. (1979). Inhibition of pentagastrin and insulin-stimulated gastric secretion by pirenzepine in healthy and duodenal ulcer subjects.. PubMed. 57. 63–7.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.