This map shows the geographic impact of A Mathur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Mathur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Mathur more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Mathur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Mathur. The network helps show where A Mathur may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A Mathur
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A Mathur.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A Mathur based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A Mathur. A Mathur is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kumar, Naresh, et al.. (2021). Efficiency of vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine HCl) on production of Endogenous IAA for growth promotion in Zea mays varieties (Azam & Jalal). International Journal of Botany Studies. 6(4). 486–492.3 indexed citations
Misra, U. K., Jayantee Kalita, Divya Goel, & A Mathur. (2003). Clinical, radiological and neurophysiological spectrum of JEV encephalitis and other non-specific encephalitis during post-monsoon period in India.. PubMed. 51(1). 55–9.36 indexed citations
Chaturvedi, Pankaj, Rinee Mukherjee, U. C. Chaturvedi, & A Mathur. (1992). Characterization of the dengue virus-induced helper cytokine.. PubMed. 73(3). 263–72.9 indexed citations
8.
Chaturvedi, U. C., et al.. (1990). Antigenic competition between dengue and Coxsackie viruses for presentation to B cells by macrophages.. PubMed. 71(6). 761–70.4 indexed citations
9.
Khanna, Madhu, et al.. (1990). Increased capillary permeability mediated by a dengue virus-induced lymphokine.. PubMed. 69(3). 449–53.45 indexed citations
10.
Mathur, A, et al.. (1988). Immunopathological study of spleen during Japanese encephalitis virus infection in mice.. PubMed. 69(3). 423–32.53 indexed citations
11.
Chaturvedi, U. C., et al.. (1987). Macrophage functions during dengue virus infection: antigenic stimulation of B cells.. PubMed. 62(3). 493–8.9 indexed citations
12.
Chaturvedi, U. C., et al.. (1983). Dengue virus-induced cytotoxic factor induces macrophages to produce a cytotoxin.. PubMed. 49(1). 121–30.14 indexed citations
Mathur, A, et al.. (1983). Studies on dengue virus-induced cytotoxic factor.. PubMed. 21(7). 375–8.2 indexed citations
15.
Mathur, A, et al.. (1982). Congenital rubella following inapparent rubella infection.. PubMed. 75. 469–73.8 indexed citations
16.
Chaturvedi, U. C., et al.. (1982). Inhibition of E-rosette formation and phagocytosis by human blood leucocytes after treatment with the dengue virus-induced cytotoxic factor.. PubMed. 45(4). 679–85.13 indexed citations
17.
Tandon, Pushpa, U. C. Chaturvedi, & A Mathur. (1979). Differential depletion of T lymphocytes in the spleen of dengue virus-infected mice.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 37(1). 1–6.25 indexed citations
18.
Mathur, A, U. C. Chaturvedi, & R. M. L. Mehrotra. (1974). Serological study for the prevalence of rubella at Lucknow.. PubMed. 62(2). 307–12.15 indexed citations
19.
Mathur, A, et al.. (1973). Prevalence of antibodies against enteroviruses in the populations of Lucknow.. PubMed. 61(12). 1799–809.5 indexed citations
20.
Chaturvedi, U. C., et al.. (1970). Erythrocytic factors and viral haemagglutination.. PubMed. 58(9). 1217–25.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.