Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Pathological Changes During Aging in, Barrier-Reared Fischer 344 Male Rats
1977416 citationsStephen W. Barthold, G. W. Osbaldiston et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. M. Jonas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. M. Jonas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. M. Jonas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. M. Jonas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. M. Jonas. The network helps show where A. M. Jonas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. M. Jonas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. M. Jonas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. M. Jonas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. M. Jonas. A. M. Jonas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jonas, A. M.. (1984). Health Benefits of Animal Research: The Mouse in Biomedical Research.. 27(5).
3.
Jonas, A. M.. (1984). The mouse in biomedical research.. PubMed. 27(5). 330–46.13 indexed citations
4.
Jonas, A. M., et al.. (1982). Differential effects of chemical and physical restraint on carbohydrate tolerance testing in nonhuman primates.. PubMed. 32(3). 263–6.20 indexed citations
5.
Bhatt, P. N., W. G. Downs, Sonja M. Buckley, et al.. (1981). Mousepox epizootic in an experimental and a barrier mouse colony at Yale University.. PubMed. 31(5 Pt 2). 560–4.3 indexed citations
6.
Jonas, A. M., et al.. (1980). Lactose intolerance in the stumptail macaque (Macaca arctoides): case report.. PubMed. 30(1). 80–4.6 indexed citations
7.
Lai, Y L, Robert O. Jacoby, & A. M. Jonas. (1978). Age-related and light-associated retinal changes in Fischer rats.. PubMed. 17(7). 634–8.98 indexed citations
8.
Barthold, Stephen W., G. W. Osbaldiston, & A. M. Jonas. (1977). Dietary, bacterial, and host genetic interactions in the pathogenesis of transmissible murine colonic hyperplasia.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 27(6). 938–45.48 indexed citations
Mitruka, B. M., et al.. (1973). Rapid differentiation of certain bacteria in mixed populations by gas-liquid chromatography.. PubMed. 46(2). 104–12.2 indexed citations
13.
Percy, D. H., et al.. (1972). Experimental Brucella canis infection in the monkey (Macaca arctoides).. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 36(3). 221–5.17 indexed citations
Jonas, A. M., Joseph L. Craft, Lindsay W. Black, P. N. Bhatt, & David A. Hilding. (1969). Sialodacryoadenitis in the rat. A light and electron microscopic study.. PubMed. 88(6). 613–22.21 indexed citations
Jonas, A. M., et al.. (1965). Enzootic intestinal adenocarcinoma in hamsters.. PubMed. 147(10). 1102–8.22 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.