A. K. Hüttel

1.8k total citations
41 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

A. K. Hüttel is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, A. K. Hüttel has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 26 papers in Materials Chemistry and 14 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in A. K. Hüttel's work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (26 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (15 papers) and Graphene research and applications (13 papers). A. K. Hüttel is often cited by papers focused on Quantum and electron transport phenomena (26 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (15 papers) and Graphene research and applications (13 papers). A. K. Hüttel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. A. K. Hüttel's co-authors include Herre S. J. van der Zant, B. Witkamp, Menno Poot, Gary A. Steele, Leo P. Kouwenhoven, K. Eberl, J. P. Kotthaus, Robert H. Blick, Alexander W. Holleitner and H. B. Meerwaldt and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Advanced Materials.

In The Last Decade

A. K. Hüttel

40 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. K. Hüttel Germany 15 1.2k 641 513 124 97 41 1.3k
Gang Cao China 22 1.2k 1.0× 569 0.9× 425 0.8× 85 0.7× 124 1.3× 93 1.4k
Romain Maurand France 22 1.5k 1.2× 804 1.3× 535 1.0× 240 1.9× 113 1.2× 45 1.7k
Marta Prada United States 11 599 0.5× 410 0.6× 233 0.5× 73 0.6× 81 0.8× 30 702
Vyacheslavs Kashcheyevs Latvia 16 878 0.7× 461 0.7× 219 0.4× 94 0.8× 43 0.4× 40 1.0k
H.-P. Tranitz Germany 17 1.3k 1.1× 632 1.0× 225 0.4× 210 1.7× 59 0.6× 41 1.4k
F. T. Vasko Ukraine 17 656 0.5× 355 0.6× 414 0.8× 77 0.6× 166 1.7× 109 966
L. Y. Gorelik Sweden 17 1.0k 0.9× 617 1.0× 205 0.4× 156 1.3× 30 0.3× 91 1.2k
E. A. de Andrada e Silva Brazil 15 1.5k 1.3× 665 1.0× 434 0.8× 462 3.7× 50 0.5× 52 1.7k
R. Knobel United States 10 803 0.7× 509 0.8× 177 0.3× 52 0.4× 97 1.0× 23 900
Eric Stinaff United States 16 1.2k 1.0× 702 1.1× 476 0.9× 80 0.6× 95 1.0× 38 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by A. K. Hüttel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. K. Hüttel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. K. Hüttel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. K. Hüttel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. K. Hüttel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. K. Hüttel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. K. Hüttel. The network helps show where A. K. Hüttel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. K. Hüttel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. K. Hüttel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. K. Hüttel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. K. Hüttel. A. K. Hüttel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Remškar, Maja, et al.. (2024). Modulations of the work function and morphology of a single MoS2 nanotube by charge injection. Nanoscale Advances. 6(16). 4075–4081. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kronseder, M., et al.. (2024). Material Transfer and Contact Optimization in MoS2 Nanotube Devices. physica status solidi (b). 262(3). 2 indexed citations
3.
Loh, Adeline, et al.. (2023). Optomechanical Coupling and Damping of a Carbon Nanotube Quantum Dot. Physical Review Applied. 20(6).
4.
Will, M., et al.. (2023). Stepwise Fabrication and Optimization of Coplanar Waveguide Resonator Hybrid Devices. physica status solidi (b). 260(12). 1 indexed citations
5.
Kronseder, M., et al.. (2023). Non‐Destructive Low‐Temperature Contacts to MoS2 Nanoribbon and Nanotube Quantum Dots. Advanced Materials. 35(13). e2209333–e2209333. 10 indexed citations
6.
Schmid, Daniel, P. L. Stiller, Alois Dirnaichner, & A. K. Hüttel. (2020). From Transparent Conduction to Coulomb Blockade at Fixed Hole Number. physica status solidi (b). 257(12). 2 indexed citations
7.
Schmid, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Nanomechanical Characterization of the Kondo Charge Dynamics in a Carbon Nanotube. Physical Review Letters. 120(24). 246802–246802. 12 indexed citations
8.
Dirnaichner, Alois, et al.. (2016). Secondary Electron Interference from Trigonal Warping in Clean Carbon Nanotubes. Physical Review Letters. 117(16). 166804–166804. 10 indexed citations
9.
Schmid, Daniel, Sergey Smirnov, Magdalena Margańska, et al.. (2015). Broken SU(4) symmetry in a Kondo-correlated carbon nanotube. Physical Review B. 91(15). 33 indexed citations
10.
Kumar, Ankit, et al.. (2014). Temperature dependence of Andreev spectra in a superconducting carbon nanotube quantum dot. Physical Review B. 89(7). 44 indexed citations
11.
Geiger, Thomas, et al.. (2014). Subgap spectroscopy of thermally excited quasiparticles in a Nb-contacted carbon nanotube quantum dot. Physical Review B. 89(24). 5 indexed citations
12.
Stiller, P. L., et al.. (2013). Negative frequency tuning of a carbon nanotube nano-electromechanical resonator under tension. physica status solidi (b). 250(12). 2518–2522. 5 indexed citations
13.
Schmid, Daniel, et al.. (2012). Magnetic damping of a carbon nanotube nano-electromechanical resonator. New Journal of Physics. 14(8). 83024–83024. 24 indexed citations
14.
Hüttel, A. K., et al.. (2011). Universality of the Kondo Effect in Quantum Dots with Ferromagnetic Leads. Physical Review Letters. 107(17). 176808–176808. 69 indexed citations
15.
Hüttel, A. K., Gary A. Steele, B. Witkamp, et al.. (2009). Carbon Nanotubes as Ultrahigh Quality Factor Mechanical Resonators. Nano Letters. 9(7). 2547–2552. 267 indexed citations
16.
Hüttel, A. K., B. Witkamp, Martin Leijnse, M. R. Wegewijs, & Herre S. J. van der Zant. (2009). Pumping of Vibrational Excitations in the Coulomb-Blockade Regime in a Suspended Carbon Nanotube. Physical Review Letters. 102(22). 225501–225501. 66 indexed citations
17.
Hüttel, A. K., Stefan Ludwig, K. Eberl, & J. P. Kotthaus. (2006). Spectroscopy of molecular states in a few-electron double quantum dot. Physica E Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures. 35(2). 278–284. 2 indexed citations
18.
Hüttel, A. K., Stefan Ludwig, H. Lorenz, K. Eberl, & J. P. Kotthaus. (2005). Direct control of the tunnel splitting in a one-electron double quantum dot. Physical Review B. 72(8). 63 indexed citations
19.
Qin, Hua, Alexander W. Holleitner, A. K. Hüttel, et al.. (2004). Probing coherent electronic states in double quantum dots. Physica status solidi. C, Conferences and critical reviews/Physica status solidi. C, Current topics in solid state physics. 1(8). 2094–2110. 3 indexed citations
20.
Hüttel, A. K., H. Qin, Alexander W. Holleitner, et al.. (2003). Spin blockade in ground-state resonance of a quantum dot. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 62(5). 712–718. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026