This map shows the geographic impact of A. J. Dik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. J. Dik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. J. Dik more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. J. Dik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. J. Dik. The network helps show where A. J. Dik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. J. Dik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. J. Dik.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. J. Dik based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. J. Dik. A. J. Dik is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Haan, J.J. de, et al.. (2005). Best practices gewasbescherming. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 36.1 indexed citations
2.
Dik, A. J. & J.J. de Haan. (2004). Best Practices Gewasbescherming. Glastuinbouw. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
3.
Steen, J.J.M. van der, et al.. (2003). Aspects of the use of honeybees and bumblebees as vector of antagonistic micro-organisms in plant diseas control. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 15. 41–46.6 indexed citations
4.
Bélanger, Richard R., C. L’abbé, W. R. Bushnell, A. J. Dik, & T.L.W. Carver. (2002). Control of powdery mildews without chemicals: prophylactic and biological alternatives for horticultural crops.. 98(5). 256–267.50 indexed citations
5.
Vogel, John P., Shauna Somerville, Richard R. Bélanger, et al.. (2002). Powdery mildew of Arabidopsis: a model system for host-parasite interactions.. 161–168.7 indexed citations
6.
Gubler, W. D., Gary G. Grove, Richard R. Bélanger, et al.. (2002). Epidemiology of powdery mildews in agricultural pathosystems.. 169–199.64 indexed citations
7.
Brown, James K. M., Richard R. Bélanger, W. R. Bushnell, A. J. Dik, & T.L.W. Carver. (2002). Comparative genetics of avirulence and fungicide resistance in the powdery mildew fungi.. 56–65.22 indexed citations
8.
Salmeron, John M., Bernard Vernooij, Kay A. Lawton, et al.. (2002). Powdery mildew control through transgenic expression of antifungal proteins, resistance genes, and systemic acquired resistance.. 268–287.5 indexed citations
9.
Collinge, David B., Per L. Gregersen, Hans Thordal‐Christensen, et al.. (2002). The nature and role of defense response genes in cereals.. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 146–160.14 indexed citations
10.
Clarke, Donald D., Abdellah Akhkha, Richard R. Bélanger, et al.. (2002). Population genetics of powdery mildew-natural plant pathosystems.. 200–218.7 indexed citations
11.
Spanu, Pietro D., Sarah J. Gurr, Richard R. Bélanger, et al.. (2002). DNA-mediated transformation of Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei.. 100–106.
12.
Bélanger, Richard R., et al.. (2002). Localized induction of accessibility and inaccessibility by powdery mildew.. 126–133.8 indexed citations
13.
Hsam, S. L. K., F. J. Zeller, Richard R. Bélanger, et al.. (2002). Breeding for powdery mildew resistance in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).. 219–238.78 indexed citations
14.
Jahn, Molly, H. M. Munger, James D. McCreight, et al.. (2002). Breeding cucurbit crops for powdery mildew resistance.. 239–248.46 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.