Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The MAVEN Solar Wind Electron Analyzer
2016250 citationsD. L. Mitchell, C. Mazelle et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Fedorov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Fedorov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Fedorov more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Fedorov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Fedorov. The network helps show where A. Fedorov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Fedorov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Fedorov.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Fedorov based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. Fedorov. A. Fedorov is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dimmock, A. P., Emiliya Yordanova, D. B. Graham, et al.. (2022). Mirror Mode Storms Observed by Solar Orbiter. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 127(11).4 indexed citations
Collinson, G., J. S. Halekas, J. M. Grebowsky, et al.. (2015). A hot flow anomaly at Mars. Geophysical Research Letters. 42(21). 9121–9127.19 indexed citations
13.
Fränz, M., Yong Wei, D. D. Morgan, et al.. (2013). Cold Ion Escape from Mars. 2019.1 indexed citations
14.
Järvinen, R., et al.. (2012). Magnetic connectivity and photoelectrons in the Venus plasma environment.1 indexed citations
15.
Masunaga, Kei, Yoshifumi Futaana, M. Yamauchi, et al.. (2011). O+ outflow channels around Venus controlled by directions of the interplanetary magnetic field. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2011.1 indexed citations
16.
Fränz, M., E. Dubinin, E. Nielsen, et al.. (2010). Trans-terminator flow in the ionosphere of Mars. 120.
17.
Zastenker, G. N., et al.. (2000). Peculiarities of Usage of Integral Faraday Cups aboard the INTERBALL-1 Satellite: Reduction of Photocurrent and Determination of Incoming Angles and Velocities of Ion Flux in the Solar Wind and the Magnetosheath. Cosmic Research. 38(1). 20.20 indexed citations
18.
Kirpichev, I. P., et al.. (1999). Quasi-trapping of Charged Particles in the Region of a Local Magnetic Field Minimum in the Outer Cusp. Cosmic Research. 37(6). 600.3 indexed citations
19.
Zastenker, G. N., Jana Šafránková, Zdeněk Němeček, et al.. (1999). Strong and Fast Variations of Parameters in the Magnetosheath: 1. Variations of Ion Flux and Other Plasma Characteristics. Cosmic Research. 37(6). 569.11 indexed citations
20.
Budnik, E., A. Fedorov, & I. Sandahl. (1998). First Results from the Plasma Mass Spectrometer PROMICS-3 in the INTERBALL Project (Auroral Probe). Cosmic Research. 36(1). 68.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.