A. Fazio

928 total citations
36 papers, 354 citations indexed

About

A. Fazio is a scholar working on Radiation, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Fazio has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 354 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Radiation, 22 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 15 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in A. Fazio's work include Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (22 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (18 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (18 papers). A. Fazio is often cited by papers focused on Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (22 papers), Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques (18 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (18 papers). A. Fazio collaborates with scholars based in Italy, France and United Kingdom. A. Fazio's co-authors include P. De Felice, M. Capogni, V. Pasquale, Massimo Verdoya, P. Chiozzi, R. Biagini, A. Ceccatelli, M. D’Andrea, Lidia Strigari and Marco D’Arienzo and has published in prestigious journals such as Molecules, Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research and Journal of Environmental Radioactivity.

In The Last Decade

A. Fazio

34 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. Fazio Italy 10 231 181 118 56 51 36 354
Jean‐Pascal Laedermann Switzerland 14 308 1.3× 407 2.2× 129 1.1× 131 2.3× 68 1.3× 27 541
Muhammad Usman Rajput Pakistan 10 121 0.5× 170 0.9× 66 0.6× 58 1.0× 72 1.4× 25 294
M. Capogni Italy 11 282 1.2× 131 0.7× 112 0.9× 34 0.6× 29 0.6× 65 390
Stefan Röttger Germany 14 345 1.5× 189 1.0× 60 0.5× 92 1.6× 52 1.0× 55 498
H. Stroh Belgium 12 255 1.1× 171 0.9× 94 0.8× 72 1.3× 18 0.4× 39 381
L. Pibida United States 13 305 1.3× 195 1.1× 123 1.0× 125 2.2× 55 1.1× 56 505
S. Georgiev Bulgaria 12 295 1.3× 360 2.0× 93 0.8× 121 2.2× 38 0.7× 61 421
G. Marissens Belgium 14 312 1.4× 160 0.9× 33 0.3× 87 1.6× 66 1.3× 50 519
M. Korun Slovenia 14 507 2.2× 475 2.6× 44 0.4× 134 2.4× 150 2.9× 90 699
Nobuhito Ishigure Japan 13 177 0.8× 197 1.1× 192 1.6× 157 2.8× 81 1.6× 70 558

Countries citing papers authored by A. Fazio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Fazio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Fazio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Fazio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Fazio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Fazio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Fazio. The network helps show where A. Fazio may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Fazio

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Fazio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Fazio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Fazio. A. Fazio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Capogni, M., et al.. (2024). Measurements of the absolute gamma-ray emission intensities from the decay of 166Ho. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 210. 111364–111364. 1 indexed citations
2.
Faccini, R., A. Fazio, M. Capogni, et al.. (2024). Assessment of impurity production upon 14 MeV fusion neutron irradiation of both natural and isotopically enriched $$^{100}$$Mo samples. The European Physical Journal Plus. 139(9).
3.
Marouli, M., G. Lutter, S. Pommé, et al.. (2018). Measurement of absolute γ-ray emission probabilities in the decay of 227Ac in equilibrium with its progeny. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 144. 34–46. 9 indexed citations
4.
Felice, P. De, A. Fazio, Andrea Petrucci, et al.. (2017). Characterization and calibration of a novel detection system for real time monitoring of radioactive contamination in water processed at water treatment facilities. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 126. 138–145. 3 indexed citations
5.
Capogni, M., A. Pietropaolo, L. Quintieri, et al.. (2017). 99m Tc by 99 Mo produced at the ENEA-FNG facility of 14 MeV neutrons. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 134. 105–107. 5 indexed citations
6.
Mauring, Alexander, et al.. (2017). InSiCal – A tool for calculating calibration factors and activity concentrations in in situ gamma spectrometry. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 188. 58–66. 9 indexed citations
7.
Capogni, M., et al.. (2017). Comparison of 131 I activity measurements at the NCBJ RC POLATOM and the ENEA-INMRI linked to the BIPM SIR system. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 134. 380–384. 1 indexed citations
8.
D’Arienzo, Marco, M G Cox, M. D’Andrea, et al.. (2016). Gamma camera calibration and validation for quantitative SPECT imaging with 177Lu. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 112. 156–164. 35 indexed citations
9.
D’Arienzo, Marco, A. Fazio, P. De Felice, et al.. (2016). Quantitative 177 Lu SPECT imaging using advanced correction algorithms in non-reference geometry. Physica Medica. 32(12). 1745–1752. 8 indexed citations
10.
Michotte, C, I. A. Kharitonov, J D Keightley, et al.. (2015). Comparison of 18 F activity measurements at the VNIIM, NPL and the ENEA-INMRI using the SIRTI of the BIPM. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 109. 17–23. 5 indexed citations
11.
Capogni, M., et al.. (2012). Comparison between two absolute methods used for 177Lu activity measurements and its standardization. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 70(9). 2075–2080. 10 indexed citations
12.
Strigari, Lidia, Marcello Benassi, P. De Felice, et al.. (2008). Comparison of methods to determine accurate dose calibrator activity measurements. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research. 27(1). 14–14. 3 indexed citations
13.
Capogni, M., et al.. (2008). Development of a primary standard for calibration of 64Cu activity measurement systems. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 66(6-7). 948–953. 11 indexed citations
14.
Cannatà, Vittorio, et al.. (2007). Experimental determination of the radionuclide calibrator setting for Technesium-99m, by using a primary standardisation method. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 28(4). 321–326. 3 indexed citations
15.
Capogni, M., A. Ceccatelli, P. De Felice, & A. Fazio. (2006). Random-summing correction and pile-up rejection in the sum-peak method. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 64(10-11). 1229–1233. 17 indexed citations
16.
Fazio, A., et al.. (2006). Close-geometry efficiency calibration of p-type HPGe detectors with a Cs-134 point source. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 64(10-11). 1303–1306. 1 indexed citations
17.
Anagnostakis, M.J., et al.. (2004). A preliminary intercomparison of gamma-ray spectrometry on building materials. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 61(2-3). 381–388. 4 indexed citations
18.
Sahagia, Maria, et al.. (2003). Standardization of 65Zn by 4πPC-γ coincidence counting method with efficiency extrapolation. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 60(2-4). 423–427. 6 indexed citations
19.
Felice, P. De, et al.. (2002). A national campaign for coincidence-summing correction in γ-ray spectrometry. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 56(1-2). 117–123. 1 indexed citations
20.
Gualdrini, G., et al.. (2000). Development and characterisation of a head calibration phantom for in vivo measurements of actinides. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 53(1-2). 387–393. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026