Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Combined TOA/MDF Technology Upgrade of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network
1998892 citationsKenneth L. Cummins, Martin J. Murphy et al.Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheresprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. E. Pifer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. E. Pifer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. E. Pifer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. E. Pifer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. E. Pifer. The network helps show where A. E. Pifer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. E. Pifer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. E. Pifer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. E. Pifer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. E. Pifer. A. E. Pifer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nag, Amitabh, Martin J. Murphy, A. E. Pifer, Kenneth L. Cummins, & John A. Cramer. (2013). Upgrade of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network in 2013. AGUFM. 2013.3 indexed citations
Cummins, Kenneth L., et al.. (1998). A Combined TOA/MDF Technology Upgrade of the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 103(D8). 9035–9044.892 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Pifer, A. E., et al.. (1991). Range estimation techniques in single-station thunderstorm warning sensors based upon gated, wideband, magnetic direction finder technology. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
Bowen, T., et al.. (1983). Observations of Large Abundances of Low-Energy Antiprotons. International Cosmic Ray Conference. 2. 96.1 indexed citations
8.
Baker, W., D. P. Eartly, Arlene Lennox, et al.. (1983). Pion-proton backward elastic scattering between 30 and 90 GeV/c. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 27(9). 1999–2017.9 indexed citations
9.
Krider, E. Philip, et al.. (1983). Wideband Magnetic Direction Finder Networks for Locating Cloud-to-Ground Lightning,.5 indexed citations
Krider, E. Philip, A. E. Pifer, & M. A. Uman. (1980). An automatic locating system for cloud-to-ground lightning. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).
Bowen, T., E. W. Jenkins, R. M. Kalbach, et al.. (1972). Pion-Nucleon Total Cross Sections from 0.4 to 0.90 GeV/c. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 6(5). 1199–1202.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.