Countries citing papers authored by A. E. McKinnon
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of A. E. McKinnon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. E. McKinnon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. E. McKinnon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. E. McKinnon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. E. McKinnon. The network helps show where A. E. McKinnon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. E. McKinnon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. E. McKinnon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. E. McKinnon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. E. McKinnon. A. E. McKinnon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gibbs, Shirley, Gary Steel, & A. E. McKinnon. (2015). A content validity approach to creating an end-user computer skill assessment tool. Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University). 19(1).2 indexed citations
2.
Gibbs, Shirley, Gary Steel, & A. E. McKinnon. (2014). Are workplace end-user computing skills at a desirable level? A New Zealand perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.6 indexed citations
3.
Daradkeh, Mohammad, et al.. (2013). Supporting informed decision-making under uncertainty and risk through interactive visualisation. Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University). 23–32.5 indexed citations
4.
Daradkeh, Mohammad, et al.. (2010). Visualisation tools for exploring the uncertainty-risk relationship in the decision-making process: a preliminary empirical evaluation. 42–51.3 indexed citations
5.
Rutherford, Paul, et al.. (2010). Usability of navigation tools for browsing genetic sequences. Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University). 33–41.2 indexed citations
Gibbs, Shirley & A. E. McKinnon. (2009). The Computing Skills expected of Business Graduates: a New Zealand study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 628.2 indexed citations
8.
Irie, Kenji, A. E. McKinnon, K. Unsworth, & Ian Woodhead. (2008). Measurement of Digital Camera Image Noise for Imaging Applications. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.9 indexed citations
9.
Irie, Kenji, A. E. McKinnon, K. Unsworth, & Ian Woodhead. (2008). A Technique for Evaluation of CCD Video-Camera Noise. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. 18(2). 280–284.53 indexed citations
10.
Irie, Kenji, A. E. McKinnon, K. Unsworth, & Ian Woodhead. (2007). Shadow removal for object tracking in complex outdoor scenes. Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University).3 indexed citations
11.
Bell, Stephen T., et al.. (2005). Estimation of parameter distributions in a model of magnesium dynamics in cows to predict the risk of tetany in dairy herds. Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University).1 indexed citations
McKinnon, A. E., M. J. McDonnell, P. J. Napier, & R.H.T. Bates. (1976). Self-Consistent Deconvolution: II. Applications. Optik. 44. 253–272.1 indexed citations
20.
Bates, R.H.T., P. J. Napier, A. E. McKinnon, & M. J. McDonnell. (1975). Self-Consistent Deconvolution: I - Theory. Optik. 44. 183–201.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.