Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Distribution ofLegionellaSpecies and Serogroups Isolated by Culture in Patients with Sporadic Community‐Acquired Legionellosis: An International Collaborative Survey
2002520 citationsVictor L. Yu, Joseph F. Plouffe et al.The Journal of Infectious Diseasesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A Chereshsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Chereshsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Chereshsky more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Chereshsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Chereshsky. The network helps show where A Chereshsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A Chereshsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A Chereshsky.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A Chereshsky based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A Chereshsky. A Chereshsky is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Yu, Victor L., Joseph F. Plouffe, Maddalena Castellani Pastoris, et al.. (2002). Distribution ofLegionellaSpecies and Serogroups Isolated by Culture in Patients with Sporadic Community‐Acquired Legionellosis: An International Collaborative Survey. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 186(1). 127–128.520 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Everts, Richard J., David R. Murdoch, Stephen T. Chambers, et al.. (2000). Nosocomial pneumonia in adult general medical and surgical patients at Christchurch Hospital.. PubMed. 113(1111). 221–4.14 indexed citations
Schousboe, Mona, Simon Gibbons, & A Chereshsky. (1995). Community-acquired pneumonia due to Legionella feeleii serogroup 2.. PubMed. 108(1003). 279–279.2 indexed citations
7.
Schousboe, Mona & A Chereshsky. (1995). Fatal pneumonia due to Legionella bozemanii serogroup 1 in a patient with occult malignant lymphoma.. PubMed. 108(997). 127–8.1 indexed citations
8.
Thomas, Merlin C., A Chereshsky, & Kimberly D. Manning. (1994). An outbreak of leptospirosis on a single farm in east Otago.. PubMed. 107(982). 290–1.2 indexed citations
9.
Mitchell, Patrick K., et al.. (1991). Legionellosis in New Zealand: first recorded outbreak.. PubMed. 104(915). 275–6.11 indexed citations
10.
Nunn, Chris, et al.. (1990). Atypical pneumonia caused by dual infection with Legionella pneumophila and Mycoplasma pneumoniae.. PubMed. 103(900). 512–3.3 indexed citations
Chereshsky, A, et al.. (1983). The ecology of Escherichia coli in a maternity ward in Christchurch, New Zealand.. PubMed. 178(4). 389–93.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.