A. Ćeller

4.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
194 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

A. Ćeller is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiation and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Ćeller has authored 194 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 152 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 58 papers in Radiation and 47 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in A. Ćeller's work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (138 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (58 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (47 papers). A. Ćeller is often cited by papers focused on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (138 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (58 papers) and Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (47 papers). A. Ćeller collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. A. Ćeller's co-authors include R. Harrop, Andriy Andreyev, Sergey Shcherbinin, Arkadiusz Sitek, Xinchi Hou, Carlos Uribe, Yuni K. Dewaraja, K. P. Jackson, Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner and Keith F. Eckerman and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

In The Last Decade

A. Ćeller

186 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

MIRD Pamphlet No. 26: Joint EANM/MIRD Guidelines for Quan... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
A. Ćeller Canada 32 2.0k 886 758 534 436 194 3.1k
R.J. Ott United Kingdom 26 1.5k 0.7× 753 0.8× 398 0.5× 353 0.7× 328 0.8× 167 2.5k
Guang‐Hong Chen United States 34 2.6k 1.3× 863 1.0× 118 0.2× 2.2k 4.2× 363 0.8× 233 4.2k
A. Del Guerra Italy 35 2.7k 1.3× 3.1k 3.5× 865 1.1× 922 1.7× 941 2.2× 344 4.9k
T. Ichihara Japan 24 1.4k 0.7× 522 0.6× 820 1.1× 666 1.2× 132 0.3× 111 2.4k
Federica Cattani Italy 24 632 0.3× 1.1k 1.3× 688 0.9× 225 0.4× 824 1.9× 138 2.9k
Martina Descovich United States 22 651 0.3× 1.0k 1.2× 306 0.4× 254 0.5× 566 1.3× 80 1.4k
J. M. Udı́as Spain 32 891 0.4× 765 0.9× 1.9k 2.6× 335 0.6× 287 0.7× 216 3.2k
G. Muehllehner United States 34 3.5k 1.7× 2.4k 2.7× 214 0.3× 960 1.8× 272 0.6× 96 4.1k
S. Majewski United States 29 1.3k 0.6× 1.5k 1.7× 689 0.9× 421 0.8× 252 0.6× 191 2.6k
Xizeng Wu United States 22 1.0k 0.5× 1.1k 1.3× 195 0.3× 1.0k 1.9× 800 1.8× 105 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by A. Ćeller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Ćeller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Ćeller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Ćeller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Ćeller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Ćeller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Ćeller. The network helps show where A. Ćeller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Ćeller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Ćeller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Ćeller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Ćeller. A. Ćeller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Uribe, Carlos, et al.. (2020). Comprehensive SPECT/CT system characterization and calibration for 177Lu quantitative SPECT (QSPECT) with dead-time correction. EJNMMI Physics. 7(1). 10–10. 23 indexed citations
2.
Hou, Xinchi, Julia Brosch-Lenz, Carlos Uribe, et al.. (2020). Feasibility of single-time-point dosimetry for radiopharmaceutical therapies. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 62(7). jnumed.120.254656–jnumed.120.254656. 44 indexed citations
3.
Hou, Xinchi, et al.. (2019). Analysis of radioactive waste generated during the cyclotron production of 99m Tc. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 64(5). 55008–55008. 2 indexed citations
4.
Esquinas, Pedro L., et al.. (2019). Accuracy of kidney dosimetry performed using simplified time activity curve modelling methods: a 177 Lu-DOTATATE patient study. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 64(17). 175006–175006. 22 indexed citations
6.
Prete, Michela Del, et al.. (2018). Accuracy and reproducibility of simplified QSPECT dosimetry for personalized 177Lu-octreotate PRRT. EJNMMI Physics. 5(1). 25–25. 47 indexed citations
7.
Uribe, Carlos, et al.. (2018). Deadtime effects in quantification of 177Lu activity for radionuclide therapy. EJNMMI Physics. 5(1). 2–2. 20 indexed citations
8.
Taghanaki, Saeid Asgari, et al.. (2017). Segmentation-free direct tumor volume and metabolic activity estimation from PET scans. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 63. 52–66. 11 indexed citations
9.
Ćeller, A., et al.. (2014). Comparison of internal dose estimates obtained using organ‐level, voxel S value, and Monte Carlo techniques. Medical Physics. 41(9). 92501–92501. 42 indexed citations
10.
Hou, Xinchi, K. Buckley, François Bénard, et al.. (2014). Graphical user interface for yield and dose estimations for cyclotron-produced technetium. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 59(13). 3337–3352. 4 indexed citations
11.
Maréchal, Pierre, et al.. (2007). Numerical Assessment of the Stability of Reconstruction Processes for Computed Tomography.
12.
Ćeller, A., et al.. (2003). Implementation of an analytically based scatter correction in SPECT reconstructions. 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515). 2647–2651 Vol.4. 5 indexed citations
13.
Tory, Melanie, Niklas Röber, Torsten Möller, A. Ćeller, & M. Stella Atkins. (2001). 4D space-time techniques: a medical imaging case study. IEEE Visualization. 473–476. 13 indexed citations
14.
Jackson, K. P., W.P. Alford, R. Abegg, et al.. (1994). Spin-isospin strength distributions forfpshell nuclei: Results for theMn55(n,p),Fe56(n,p), andNi58(n,p) reactions at 198 MeV. Physical Review C. 49(6). 3128–3136. 83 indexed citations
15.
Ćeller, A., S. Yen, W.P. Alford, et al.. (1993). Search for Gamow-Teller strength in the continuum via theHe3(n,p)3H reaction at 288 MeV. Physical Review C. 47(4). 1563–1570. 7 indexed citations
16.
Alford, W.P., B. A. Brown, Stanisław Burzyński, et al.. (1993). Spin-isospin strength distributions inf-pshell nuclei: A study of theV51(n,p) andCo59(n,p) reactions at 198 MeV. Physical Review C. 48(6). 2818–2827. 43 indexed citations
17.
Hicks, K. H., A. Ćeller, R. S. Henderson, et al.. (1993). Comparison of the quasifree charge-exchange reaction forC12andFe54. Physical Review C. 47(1). 260–266. 4 indexed citations
18.
Iwasaki, M., A. Trudel, A. Ćeller, et al.. (1991). Search for deeply bound pionic states inPb208using thePb208(n,p) reaction atTn=418 MeV. Physical Review C. 43(3). 1099–1105. 22 indexed citations
19.
Watson, J. W., Munir Ahmad, W.P. Alford, et al.. (1991). Energy dependence of stretched states excited in (p,n) reactions. Physical Review C. 44(2). 689–699. 6 indexed citations
20.
Häusser, O., M. C. Vetterli, R. W. Fergerson, et al.. (1991). Nuclear response in theFe54(p→,p→’) reaction at 290 MeV. Physical Review C. 43(1). 230–249. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026