A. C. Fauth
-
- Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics 5
- Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics 4
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 2
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 2
-
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 13
- Neutrino Physics Research 6
- Particle Detector Development and Performance 5
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena 3
- Co-authors
- V. KopenkinK. H. TsuiA. A. NepomucenoH. Vieira de SouzaE. J. Tonelli ManganoteP. MirandaC. CastromonteI. Sidelnik
In The Last Decade
A. C. Fauth
13 papers receiving 54 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 37
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 26
- Radiation 4
- Geophysics 6
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 2
Countries citing papers authored by A. C. Fauth
This map shows the geographic impact of A. C. Fauth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. C. Fauth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. C. Fauth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. C. Fauth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. C. Fauth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. C. Fauth. The network helps show where A. C. Fauth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. C. Fauth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 16 | Study of the Fluorescence Yield for Electrons Between 0.5 - 2.2 MeV | 2003 | 2 |
| 17 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 18 | The EASCAMP Detector at Campinas | 1995 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 0 | |
| 20 | Three-Dimensional Propagation of Muons in Rock | 1988 | 1 |
About A. C. Fauth
A. C. Fauth is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Radiation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Geophysics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 56 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (13 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (6 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (5 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (5 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (4 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (3 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (2 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (37 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (26 citations), Radiation (4 citations), Geophysics (6 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (2 citations). A. C. Fauth has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Italy and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include V. Kopenkin, K. H. Tsui, A. A. Nepomuceno, H. Vieira de Souza, E. J. Tonelli Manganote, P. Miranda, C. Castromonte, I. Sidelnik, Jean‐Pierre Raulin and M. A. Leigui de Oliveira. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Solar Physics, Classical and Quantum Gravity, The Astrophysical Journal and Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.