Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Effects of Cold Weather on Mortality: Results From 15 European Cities Within the PHEWE Project
2008512 citationsAntonis Analitis, Klea Katsouyanni et al.American Journal of Epidemiologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A Biggeri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Biggeri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Biggeri more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A Biggeri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A Biggeri. The network helps show where A Biggeri may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A Biggeri
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A Biggeri.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A Biggeri based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A Biggeri. A Biggeri is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mangia, Cristina, et al.. (2017). [Epidemiological study on the health status of residents in Manfredonia (Italy). The beginning of the study told by the researchers].. PubMed. 39(2). 81–3.1 indexed citations
2.
Adembri, Chiara, Gabriele Accetta, Iacopo Cappellini, et al.. (2014). Use of the parenteral antibiotic Ertapenem as short term prophylaxis in bariatric surgery: a pharmaco-kinetic-pharmacodynamic study in class III obese female patients.. PubMed. 80(9). 1005–11.8 indexed citations
Analitis, Antonis, Klea Katsouyanni, A Biggeri, et al.. (2008). Effects of Cold Weather on Mortality: Results From 15 European Cities Within the PHEWE Project. American Journal of Epidemiology. 168(12). 1397–1408.512 indexed citations breakdown →
Biggeri, A, et al.. (2000). Deprivation mortality: a deprivation index suitable for geographical analysis of inequalities.. 5–5.1 indexed citations
12.
Merler, Enzo, Corrado Lagazio, & A Biggeri. (2000). [Trends in mortality from primary pleural tumor and incidence of pleural mesothelioma in Italy: a particularly serious situation].. PubMed. 23(4). 316–26.8 indexed citations
13.
Merler, Enzo, Alessandra Benvenuti, Pablo C. Baldi, et al.. (1999). [Socioeconomic inequalities in health in the Tuscany Longitudinal Study (SLTO): persistence and changes over time in overall mortality and selected causes (lung cancer, liver cirrhosis, AIDS and overdose)].. PubMed. 23(3). 207–14.8 indexed citations
Barbone, Fabio, Massimo Bovenzi, A Biggeri, et al.. (1995). [Comparison of epidemiologic methods in a case-control study of lung cancer and air pollution in Trieste, Italy].. PubMed. 19(63). 193–205.5 indexed citations
Biggeri, A, et al.. (1988). [Incidence of tumor of the female breast in the province of Florence from 1977 to 1982].. PubMed. 10(34). 26–32.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.