Standout Papers

Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. 2009 2026 2014 2020 750
  1. Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. (2009)
    William Hart, Dolores Albarracín et al. Psychological Bulletin

Immediate Impact

3 by Nobel laureates 20 from Science/Nature 57 standout
Sub-graph 1 of 25

Citing Papers

Quantifying the impact of misinformation and vaccine-skeptical content on Facebook
2024 StandoutScience
Functional traits—not nativeness—shape the effects of large mammalian herbivores on plant communities
2024 StandoutScience
2 intermediate papers

Works of William Hart being referenced

Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information.
2009 Standout

Author Peers

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
William Hart 663 613 910 117 2.3k
Steven D. Brown 359 595 735 130 3.3k
Conor M. Dowling 340 300 1354 64 2.3k
Gerald R. Miller 491 1941 1563 123 4.2k
James S. Fleming 581 963 401 57 3.0k
Christian Unkelbach 178 1306 1793 128 4.2k
Thomas Blank 763 485 959 102 3.3k
Johannes Ullrich 156 744 954 136 2.9k
Robert J. Gregory 713 302 345 160 2.9k
Richard H. Smith 883 2507 1771 100 4.7k
Stefan Hoffmann 113 291 762 187 3.9k

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless by CCL
2026