Standout Papers

Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review 2016 2026 2019 2022 312
  1. Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review (2016)
    Kirsi Sipilä, Pekka K. Vallittu et al. Journal of Prosthodontics

Immediate Impact

41 standout
Sub-graph 1 of 12

Citing Papers

Pathology of pain and its implications for therapeutic interventions
2024 Standout
Accuracy of edentulous full‐arch implant impression: An in vitro comparison between conventional impression, intraoral scan with and without splinting, and photogrammetry
2024 Standout
19 intermediate papers

Works of Ulla Kotiranta being referenced

Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review
2016 Standout
Predictors for future clinically significant pain in patients with temporomandibular disorder: A prospective cohort study
2016

Author Peers

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Ulla Kotiranta 74 113 94 316 277 10 497
Carlos dos Reis Pereira de Araújo 76 210 94 181 147 16 413
Vedrana Braut 22 73 30 285 288 14 523
P G F C M Battistuzzi 95 317 80 224 151 17 512
M.T. John 69 187 81 106 127 8 469
Mohammad Reza Badiee 20 80 41 122 157 13 415
Ee Kiam Chua 146 315 132 126 89 8 454
Osvaldo Bazzan Kaizer 34 113 51 374 320 23 505
Raoul Polansky 26 41 45 82 204 15 429
Alceu Sérgio Trindade 26 79 70 75 205 23 541
Anders Vilmann 129 331 97 243 97 8 515

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless by CCL
2026