Standout Papers

Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.... 1999 2026 2008 2017 4.2k
  1. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. (1999)
    Russell E. Glasgow, Thomas Vogt et al. American Journal of Public Health
  2. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. (2000)
    Deborah J. Toobert, Sarah E. Hampson et al. Diabetes Care
  3. Why Don’t We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness Transition (2003)
    Russell E. Glasgow, Edward Lichtenstein et al. American Journal of Public Health
  4. RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review (2019)
    Russell E. Glasgow, Samantha M. Harden et al. Frontiers in Public Health
  5. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change (2013)
    David Chambers, Russell E. Glasgow et al. Implementation Science
  6. How Can We Increase Translation of Research into Practice? Types of Evidence Needed (2006)
    Russell E. Glasgow, Karen M. Emmons Annual Review of Public Health
  7. Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research (2006)
    Lawrence W. Green, Russell E. Glasgow Evaluation & the Health Professions
  8. Development and Validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) (2005)
    Russell E. Glasgow, Edward H. Wagner et al. Medical Care
  9. A Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) for Integrating Research Findings into Practice (2008)
    Adrianne C. Feldstein, Russell E. Glasgow The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety
  10. The RE-AIM Framework: A Systematic Review of Use Over Time (2013)
    Bridget Gaglio, Jo Ann Shoup et al. American Journal of Public Health
  11. The Delivery of Public Health Interventions via the Internet: Actualizing Their Potential (2009)
    Gary G. Bennett, Russell E. Glasgow Annual Review of Public Health
  12. Quality Improvement in Chronic Illness Care: A Collaborative Approach (2001)
    Edward H. Wagner, Russell E. Glasgow et al. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
  13. National Institutes of Health Approaches to Dissemination and Implementation Science: Current and Future Directions (2012)
    Russell E. Glasgow, Cynthia Vinson et al. American Journal of Public Health
  14. Diabetes Distress but Not Clinical Depression or Depressive Symptoms Is Associated With Glycemic Control in Both Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses (2009)
    Lawrence Fisher, Joseph T. Mullan et al. Diabetes Care
  15. What Does It Mean to Be Pragmatic? Pragmatic Methods, Measures, and Models to Facilitate Research Translation (2013)
    Russell E. Glasgow Health Education & Behavior
  16. An Extension of RE-AIM to Enhance Sustainability: Addressing Dynamic Context and Promoting Health Equity Over Time (2020)
    Rachel C. Shelton, David Chambers et al. Frontiers in Public Health
  17. Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources (2021)
    Jodi Summers Holtrop, Paul A. Estabrooks et al. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
  18. Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability to Promote Equitable Impacts on Health (2022)
    Bethany M. Kwan, Ross C. Brownson et al. Annual Review of Public Health
  19. Revisiting concepts of evidence in implementation science (2022)
    Ross C. Brownson, Rachel C. Shelton et al. Implementation Science

Immediate Impact

1 from Science/Nature 89 standout
Sub-graph 1 of 19

Citing Papers

Breastfeeding: crucially important, but increasingly challenged in a market-driven world
2023 Standout
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries
2021 Standout
1 intermediate paper

Works of Russell E. Glasgow being referenced

RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review
2019 Standout
Barriers to mammography and pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening
2000

Author Peers

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Russell E. Glasgow 23572 12675 7237 9357 525 49.5k
Mika Kivimäki 24657 5419 10469 5428 1.2k 71.5k
Ali H. Mokdad 8960 7119 8976 8510 479 49.9k
Michael Marmot 42330 5602 7299 7287 857 96.2k
Andrew D Oxman 18682 4658 7826 11744 282 102.0k
Víctor M. Montori 13626 18912 4997 9250 678 74.4k
Susan Michie 33502 3146 10854 7355 568 78.9k
Cathy D. Sherbourne 15585 2928 6391 9491 223 79.2k
Edward H. Wagner 13348 6837 3259 8881 272 31.5k
Paul Glasziou 11692 4240 4254 7874 622 64.4k
L.M. Bouter 8582 6686 7597 9485 621 85.6k

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless by CCL
2026