Standout Papers

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate... 2009 2026 2014 2020 23.9k
  1. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)
    Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G. Altman et al. PLoS Medicine
  2. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)
    David Moher, Larissa Shamseer et al. Systematic Reviews
  3. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)
    A. Liberati, Doug Altman et al. BMJ
  4. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)
    Larissa Shamseer, David Moher et al. BMJ
  5. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)
    Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G. Altman et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  6. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)
    Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G. Altman et al. Annals of Internal Medicine
  7. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials (2005)
    Mike Clarke, Rory Collins et al. The Lancet
  8. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials (1998)
    Mike Clarke, R Collins The Lancet
  9. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials (2011)
    Sarah C. Darby, Paul McGale et al. The Lancet
  10. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)
    Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G. Altman et al. Italian Journal of Public Health
  11. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)
    Lesley Stewart, Mike Clarke et al. JAMA
  12. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)
    Paula Williamson, Douglas G. Altman et al. Trials
  13. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)
    Paula Williamson, Douglas G. Altman et al. Trials
  14. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012)
    Alison Booth, Mike Clarke et al. Systematic Reviews
  15. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)
    Valerie Smith, Declan Devane et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
  16. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health (2013)
    Jennifer O’Neill, Vivian Welch et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  17. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)
    Paul Glasziou, Douglas G. Altman et al. The Lancet
  18. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)
    C.A.C. Prinsen, Sunita Vohra et al. Trials
  19. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)
    Sally Hopewell, Kirsty Loudon et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  20. Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2012)
    Rebecca Turner, Mike Clarke et al. International Journal of Epidemiology
  21. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations (2017)
    Jamie J Kirkham, Katy Davis et al. PLoS Medicine
  22. Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement (2016)
    Jamie J Kirkham, Sarah L. Gorst et al. PLoS Medicine
  23. A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)
    Susanna Dodd, Mike Clarke et al. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Immediate Impact

1 by Nobel laureates 3 from Science/Nature 105 standout
Sub-graph 1 of 15

Citing Papers

Breast-Conserving Surgery with or without Irradiation in Early Breast Cancer
2023 Standout
Breast cancer
2021 Standout
57 intermediate papers

Works of Mike Clarke being referenced

Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials
2011 Standout
Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials
1998 Standout
and 3 more

Author Peers

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Mike Clarke 15038 6379 8352 21439 12834 582 119.1k
John P. A. Ioannidis 20022 18083 6378 25317 15697 1.1k 180.8k
Julian P. T. Higgins 16645 9063 4198 31545 21286 446 178.4k
Jan P. Vandenbroucke 14038 3027 2582 21047 12248 439 107.2k
Matthias Egger 24340 8665 6052 35836 19719 751 204.3k
Stuart Pocock 13808 4901 2667 31770 16133 569 137.2k
Jos Kleijnen 9753 3400 2802 16793 10270 312 86.4k
Peter C Gøtzsche 24974 9159 5823 39970 22776 276 196.6k
P.J. Devereaux 10300 5321 2773 23695 10906 395 91.9k
George Davey Smith 31623 2580 5923 22578 13869 2.0k 209.0k
M. Hassan Murad 10189 2161 1365 23034 15504 955 98.8k

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless by CCL
2026