Standout Papers

Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer 2018 2026 2020 2023 1.1k
  1. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer (2018)
    Pedro T. Ramírez, Michael Frumovitz et al. New England Journal of Medicine

Immediate Impact

1 by Nobel laureates 17 from Science/Nature 64 standout
Sub-graph 1 of 19

Citing Papers

[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE plus long-acting octreotide versus high‑dose long-acting octreotide for the treatment of newly diagnosed, advanced grade 2–3, well-differentiated, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETTER-2): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study
2024 Standout
Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer
2024 Standout

Works of Michael Frumovitz being referenced

Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: Should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care?
2013
Conservative management of early stage cervical cancer: Is there a role for less radical surgery?
2011
and 3 more

Author Peers

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Michael Frumovitz 5681 3725 2557 259 8.9k
Fabio Landoni 6042 4476 2360 236 8.9k
Philip J. DiSaia 4613 3686 2084 238 8.7k
Pedro T. Ramírez 6169 4723 2031 350 11.4k
Francesco Raspagliesi 3969 3950 1651 372 7.8k
Yukio Sonoda 5172 3604 1659 207 7.0k
Kathleen M. Schmeler 3070 2738 2067 286 7.6k
Mario M. Leitão 6890 5434 2267 319 10.7k
Charles Levenback 4417 2587 1924 101 6.7k
William M. Burke 4079 3070 979 198 7.3k
J. Taylor Wharton 2864 2713 1514 164 7.4k

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless by CCL
2026