Standout Papers

“When perhaps the real pr... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 50 100 150 200 250
What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation benchmark for papers published in the same subfield and year, or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

  1. “When perhaps the real problem is money itself!”: the practical materiality of Bitcoin
    2013 266 citations Bill Maurer, Taylor C. Nelms et al. Social Semiotics profile →

Immediate Impact

65 hit
Sub-graph 1 of 21

Citing Papers

The Making of the “Good Bad” Job: How Algorithmic Management Manufactures Consent Through Constant and Confined Choices
2024 Hit
Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change
2023 Hit
7 intermediate papers

Works of Lana Swartz being referenced

What was Bitcoin, what will it be? The techno-economic imaginaries of a new money technology
2018
“When perhaps the real problem is money itself!”: the practical materiality of Bitcoin
2013 Hit
and 1 more

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Lana Swartz 344 281 182 79 77 15 672
Bruce R. Kingma 126 0.4× 333 1.2× 84 0.5× 202 2.6× 38 0.5× 26 785
Robin Pennington 102 0.3× 283 1.0× 139 0.8× 37 0.5× 57 0.7× 16 729
Clayton Arlen Looney 135 0.4× 146 0.5× 49 0.3× 36 0.5× 112 1.5× 36 596
Kun Shin Im 106 0.3× 137 0.5× 235 1.3× 67 0.8× 62 0.8× 15 755
Clay K. Williams 84 0.2× 273 1.0× 114 0.6× 30 0.4× 61 0.8× 17 561
Kholekile L. Gwebu 174 0.5× 216 0.8× 136 0.7× 54 0.7× 104 1.4× 23 743
Joan Mann 173 0.5× 103 0.4× 227 1.2× 17 0.2× 56 0.7× 13 557
Olga Morawczynski 278 0.8× 101 0.4× 155 0.9× 371 4.7× 31 0.4× 10 747
Tina M. Loraas 108 0.3× 263 0.9× 94 0.5× 31 0.4× 128 1.7× 24 732
Jijie Wang 57 0.2× 232 0.8× 78 0.4× 36 0.5× 75 1.0× 6 613

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless by CCL
2026